Verschil en gewoonte: Deleuzes anti-Hegeliaanse kritiek van het bewustzijn.
In: Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte Vol. 114 no. 3. Themanummer Gewoontes: ontologische, fenomenologische en antropologische perspectieven. Eds. Sjoerd van Tuinen & Maren Wehrle, Amsterdam University Press, 2022.
Abstract: Since Antiquity, habit has been understood as a second nature, as something that we develop in a conscious or unconscious way, and which directs and structures both our cognitive and practical lives – our consciousness and our actions. For Hegel, habit effectuates the transition from nature to spirit or consciousness, thus forming the basis of morality. Habit thus constitutes an essential stage in the development of the mind and a crucial aspect of Hegel’s philosophical anthropology. Habit also plays a crucial role in the thinking of the French philosopher Gilles Deleuze, who characterizes his philosophical project as anti-Hegelian or anti-dialectical. Even though many works examine the relationship between Deleuze and Hegel, almost none of these discuss the concept of habit of these authors, and the role that it plays in Deleuze’s so-called anti-Hegelianism.
In this article, I address the concept of habit in Difference and Repetition, and the role it plays in Deleuze’s critique of Hegel. I also compare this concept with Hegel’s own conception of habit in his Anthropology. I show that Deleuze certainly does not understand repetition as second nature as Hegel does, because then it is impossible to account for the productive power of the unconscious or the sub-representative, and of real creativity. I distinguish my interpretation of habit in Deleuze from that of a number of other authors, who, in my view, do not draw all the conclusions from Deleuze’s interpretation of Hume. I then expound and Deleuze’s original notion of habit and compare it with Hegel’s.
About the special issue: This special issue investigates the notion of habit from an ontological, phenomenological, and anthropological perspective. From a phenomenological perspective, habit is crucial for our understanding of corporeality, agency, identity, and individuality. From an anthropological perspective, habit is that which allows us to reinterpret our relation to our natural environment, to technology, and to each other. From an ontological perspective, habit sheds new light on problems such as continuity and change, as well as on questions about nature, life, and being.
The special issue features a hitherto untranslated passage about habit from Hegel's Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences, translated to Dutch and followed by a discussion by Bart Zantvoort.